<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nike+ vs. RunKeeper for Tracking Your Running</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/</link>
	<description>health - fitness - weight loss</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:28:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-3908</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fit36.com/?p=541#comment-3908</guid>
		<description>My favourit is runtastic PRO! I really love this app :-) I really enjoy it, it is very motivating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourit is runtastic PRO! I really love this app <img src='http://www.fit36.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I really enjoy it, it is very motivating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fit36.com/?p=541#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I had Nike+ and enjoyed it but ...the battery died. I was investigating standalone GPS and balked at the price. I have an iPhone 3gs and tried the free version of RunKeeper. It worked great for the price. They had a significant update to the pro version while I was researching and took the plunge on $10 Pro. Great money spent. I&#039;ve been using it for a few runs this Spring and enjoy the Facebook integration. Very motivating since I&#039;m now working up to a Marathon in the fall.  I prefer it over Nike+

I found that when I was using the free version and running with the iPhone in my hand that it was throwing me off and making my back hurt. I decided to spring for this:  http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0018791T0  It&#039;s great (for the price).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had Nike+ and enjoyed it but &#8230;the battery died. I was investigating standalone GPS and balked at the price. I have an iPhone 3gs and tried the free version of RunKeeper. It worked great for the price. They had a significant update to the pro version while I was researching and took the plunge on $10 Pro. Great money spent. I&#8217;ve been using it for a few runs this Spring and enjoy the Facebook integration. Very motivating since I&#8217;m now working up to a Marathon in the fall.  I prefer it over Nike+</p>
<p>I found that when I was using the free version and running with the iPhone in my hand that it was throwing me off and making my back hurt. I decided to spring for this:  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0018791T0" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0018791T0</a>  It&#8217;s great (for the price).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fitman</title>
		<link>http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>fitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fit36.com/?p=541#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll post a mini-review shortly, but I took RunKeeper Free along with me this morning, and it was great. I do have an old Nano, so I could actually use that with Nike+ and it would be smaller/lighter. However... The fact that RunKeeper auto-uploads the moment you hit stop is a killer feature for me. Manual intervention (like syncing to iTunes) is so last decade!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll post a mini-review shortly, but I took RunKeeper Free along with me this morning, and it was great. I do have an old Nano, so I could actually use that with Nike+ and it would be smaller/lighter. However&#8230; The fact that RunKeeper auto-uploads the moment you hit stop is a killer feature for me. Manual intervention (like syncing to iTunes) is so last decade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaine Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaine Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fit36.com/?p=541#comment-243</guid>
		<description>My brother discovered runkeeper the other day and was trying to tell me how much better it was than using a Garmin Forerunner.

Obviously, the garmin was a better solution for me since I have no need or desire for an iPhone and it&#039;s a lot cheaper than getting a service contract with AT&amp;T.  Better support, too.

That said, if it&#039;s a decision between runkeeper or Nike+ I&#039;d go with runkeeper.  If you are going to be carrying your phone with you anyway, then why add another device?  It&#039;s cheap, it gets the job done w/minimal hassle, and it&#039;s accurate enough that the few times you lose a signal it won&#039;t be a big deal.

Personally, even if I do upgrade to an iPhone at some point, I doubt I&#039;ll start carrying it on a run anyway. I like having a wristwatch that I can look at, not a bulky block I need to pull out of a pocket or armband or something.  Also, my favorite training log is at http://www.runningahead.com and it supports Garmin, but not any of the iPhone apps (yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My brother discovered runkeeper the other day and was trying to tell me how much better it was than using a Garmin Forerunner.</p>
<p>Obviously, the garmin was a better solution for me since I have no need or desire for an iPhone and it&#8217;s a lot cheaper than getting a service contract with AT&amp;T.  Better support, too.</p>
<p>That said, if it&#8217;s a decision between runkeeper or Nike+ I&#8217;d go with runkeeper.  If you are going to be carrying your phone with you anyway, then why add another device?  It&#8217;s cheap, it gets the job done w/minimal hassle, and it&#8217;s accurate enough that the few times you lose a signal it won&#8217;t be a big deal.</p>
<p>Personally, even if I do upgrade to an iPhone at some point, I doubt I&#8217;ll start carrying it on a run anyway. I like having a wristwatch that I can look at, not a bulky block I need to pull out of a pocket or armband or something.  Also, my favorite training log is at <a href="http://www.runningahead.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.runningahead.com</a> and it supports Garmin, but not any of the iPhone apps (yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewENZ</title>
		<link>http://www.fit36.com/archives/nike-vs-runkeeper/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewENZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fit36.com/?p=541#comment-241</guid>
		<description>I want runkeeper but then I&#039;d have to buy an iphone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want runkeeper but then I&#8217;d have to buy an iphone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

